This is not a bad assumption since most entertainers are horrible people. The trouble with all of these theories is that they depend on the assumption that Carlson is something different behind the scenes. If the Times placed this story next to a story denying human intelligence, the same people would point out all of the errors in the latter but accept without question all of the claims in the former, never noticing the contradiction. It is a great example of the Gell-Mann amnesia effect. Here is Keith Woods on Twitter signal boosting the theory. According to the anti-white bigots at the New York Times, this was such an outlandish threat to “our democracy” the Murdoch clan had no choice but to expel this heretic from their company.Īmusingly, the people the Times is fond of libeling are perfectly willing to accept this as a valid theory for the firing of Tucker Carlson. In one of the text, Carlson used the phrase “white men” in a positive way. These are texts that were produced in discovery during the Dominion lawsuit. Someone at Fox News is leaking confidential company material to regime media. The New York Times has now created a new theory. This does not explain the Bongino firing, but maybe that was unrelated. The antiwar crowd has seized on this story, claiming that the Murdoch clan are either in bed with the dictator or they were pressured by the regime to get rid of their most prominent war critics. He supposedly had a call with the Murdoch clan just before they made the call on Tucker. The speech was the last straw for the Murdoch family.Ī new theory has been dropped that suggests The Ukrainian dictator Volodymyr Zelensky had Tucker fired. The speech covered a lot of ground, so the people pushing this theory were spoiled for choice. Others said Carlson’s candor about the news media in the speech is what did the trick. Reportedly, Rupert Murdoch freaks out when people mention God around him. One was that Rupert Murdoch was spooked by Tucker’s speech at Heritage. This being the current year, it did not take long for new theories to emerge. Again, the timing of this is what lends support to the claim Carlson was fired over the lawsuit. Many of the crazies jumped on this idea because it made them feel like winners. On the other hand, the Murdoch clan may have decided that they were dragged into this mess by people like Carlson, so they were going to purge the ranks of these people. Given the nastiness of the people who chant “election denier” it is perfectly reasonable to think they would demand a pound of flesh from Fox. Right after they made the deal, Tucker and Dan Bongino get fired. Facing a rigged trial, Fox agreed to pay Dominion an absurd amount of money for hurting their feelings and the feelings of the crazies who demand we believe Joe Biden is more popular than Jesus. The timing suggested it had something to do with the lawsuit Fox was forced to settle with Dominion over their coverage of the election shenanigans. The best reason so far was the first reason. Otherwise, there is nothing solid on which to base a theory. Carlson made a short video from his home studio telling his fans that everything is going to be fine. The only thing from Fox so far has been a brief statement in which they announced his departure and thanked him for his service to the company. One of the interesting elements to the Tucker Carlson story is that no one knows why he was fired, but lots of people are sure they know why he was fired.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |